Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2397-7523
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-10 ; date:12.2017
Diagnostic and prognostic research ; 1, Heft 1 (16.3.2017), 1-10, 12.2017
- Keyword
-
Krebs
Onkologie
- Creator
-
Matino, Davide
- Contributor
-
Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
Iorio, Alfonso
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s41512-017-0008-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201704022549
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Matino, Davide
- Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
- Iorio, Alfonso
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
Appraisal of umbrella reviews on vaccines
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
AMSTAR 2 appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of heart failure from high-impact journals
Appraisal of systematic reviews on interventions for postpartum depression: systematic review
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
A theoretical and experimental appraisal of five risk elicitation methods
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals