A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:12 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2017
BMC medical research methodology ; 17, Heft 1 (28.12.2017), 1-7, 12.2017
- Keyword
-
Zahnmedizin
- Creator
-
Faggion, Clovis Mariano
- Contributor
-
Bakas, Nikolaos P.
Wasiak, Jason
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201802224815
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:53 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Faggion, Clovis Mariano
- Bakas, Nikolaos P.
- Wasiak, Jason
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: a machine learning approach
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: a machine learning approach
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals