A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:12 ; year:2017 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2017
BMC medical research methodology ; 17, Heft 1 (28.12.2017), 1-7, 12.2017
- Schlagwort
-
Zahnmedizin
- Urheber
-
Faggion, Clovis Mariano
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Bakas, Nikolaos P.
Wasiak, Jason
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201802224815
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:53 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Faggion, Clovis Mariano
- Bakas, Nikolaos P.
- Wasiak, Jason
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: a machine learning approach
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: a machine learning approach
Systematic reviews of prognosis studies: a critical appraisal of five core clinical journals
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
Exploring the trade narrative in top economics journals
Rehabilitation bei Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen anhand eines narrativen Reviews
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Biophysical reviews top five: atomic force microscopy in biophysics
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Scientific value of systematic reviews: survey of editors of core clinical journals
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Gender distribution across topics in the top five economics journals: A machine learning approach
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals