'What is it like to have ME?' The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction
Abstract: ME (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis) or CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome) is a debilitating illness for which no cause or medical tests have been identified. Debates over its nature have generated interest from qualitative researchers. However, participants are difficult to recruit because of the nature of their condition. Therefore, this study explores the utility of the internet as a means of eliciting accounts. We analyse data from focus groups and the internet in order to ascertain the extent to which previous research findings apply to the internet domain. Interviews were conducted among 49 members of internet groups (38 chatline, 11 personal) and 7 members of two face-to-face support groups. Discourse analysis of descriptions and accounts of ME or CFS revealed similar devices and interactional concerns in both internet and face-to-face communication. Participants constructed their condition as serious, enigmatic and not psychological. These functioned to deflect problematic assumption
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Postprint
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Health ; 11 (2007) 1 ; 87-108
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Mannheim
- (wann)
-
2007
- Urheber
-
Guise, Jennifer
Widdicombe, Sue
McKinlay, Andy
- DOI
-
10.1177/1363459307070806
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-226102
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access unbekannt; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:54 MEZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Guise, Jennifer
- Widdicombe, Sue
- McKinlay, Andy
Entstanden
- 2007
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
'What is it like to have ME?' The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
The pitch: Some face-to-face minutes to build trust
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
'What is it like to have ME?' The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
The pitch: Some face-to-face minutes to build trust
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
'What is it like to have ME?' The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
The pitch: Some face-to-face minutes to build trust