- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
In: Communications Physics, 5, Article 127, S. 1-9
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Mannheim
- (who)
-
Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
- (when)
-
2023
- Creator
-
Oliveira, Marcos
Karimi, Fariba
Zens, Maria
Schaible, Johann
Génois, Mathieu
Strohmaier, Markus
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-662236
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
25.03.2025, 1:42 PM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Oliveira, Marcos
- Karimi, Fariba
- Zens, Maria
- Schaible, Johann
- Génois, Mathieu
- Strohmaier, Markus
- Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
Time of origin
- 2023
Other Objects (12)
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Predicting group contribution behaviour in a public goods game from face-to-face communication
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Predicting group contribution behaviour in a public goods game from face-to-face communication
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Predicting group contribution behaviour in a public goods game from face-to-face communication