Measuring Numeracy: Validity and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC)
Abstract: A tension raised in recent scholarship is that between numeracy as a social practice and numeracy as a functional skill set. Such frameworks for conceptualizing numeracy pose a challenge to assessment because what individuals do with numeracy is not the same as what individuals can do (or express) in an assessment setting. This study builds on work related to numeracy assessment through a validity examination of a portion of a well-known assessment: the OECD's Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). In following a path set out by standards for assessment, I ask: What does the PIAAC numeracy assessment claim to measure? What are the intended uses of the assessment? How are we to interpret scores with those uses in mind? And to what degree do evidence and theory support interpretations for those uses? The main finding from this work is that while score interpretations from the PIAAC numeracy assessment may be valid for the use of describing proficien
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Numeracy ; 13 (2020) 2 ; 1-37
- Klassifikation
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Mannheim
- (wer)
-
SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V.
- (wann)
-
2020
- Urheber
-
Tunstall, Samuel L.
- DOI
-
10.5038/1936-4660.13.2.1348
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-74668-6
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:44 MEZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Tunstall, Samuel L.
- SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V.
Entstanden
- 2020