Arbeitspapier
Admissibility and common belief
The concept of ‘fully permissible sets’ is defined by an algorithm that eliminates strategy subsets. It is characterized as choice sets when there is common certain belief of the event that each player prefer one strategy to another if and only if the former weakly dominates the latter on the set of all opponent strategies or on the union of the choice sets that are deemed possible for the opponent. The concept refines the Dekel-Fudenberg procedure and captures aspects of forward induction.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Memorandum ; No. 2000,07
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
- Subject
-
Spieltheorie
Theorie
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Asheim, Geir B.
Dufwenberg, Martin
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
University of Oslo, Department of Economics
- (where)
-
Oslo
- (when)
-
2000
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Asheim, Geir B.
- Dufwenberg, Martin
- University of Oslo, Department of Economics
Time of origin
- 2000
Other Objects (12)
Common belief revisited
Introduction to the Semantics of Belief and Common Belief
Intersubjective Consistency of Beliefs and the Logic of Common Belief
Belief formation in a signalling game without common prior: An experiment
Qualitative analysis of common belief of rationality in strategic-form games
A Kripke-Lewis semantics for belief update and belief revision
Belief formation and belief updating under ambiguity: Evidence from experiments
Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives
Associative Memory and Belief Formation
Belief polarization and Covid-19
On the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rules
Contingent belief updating
Common belief revisited
Introduction to the Semantics of Belief and Common Belief
Intersubjective Consistency of Beliefs and the Logic of Common Belief
Belief formation in a signalling game without common prior: An experiment
Qualitative analysis of common belief of rationality in strategic-form games
A Kripke-Lewis semantics for belief update and belief revision
Belief formation and belief updating under ambiguity: Evidence from experiments
Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives
Associative Memory and Belief Formation
Belief polarization and Covid-19
On the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rules
Contingent belief updating
Common belief revisited
Introduction to the Semantics of Belief and Common Belief
Intersubjective Consistency of Beliefs and the Logic of Common Belief
Belief formation in a signalling game without common prior: An experiment
Qualitative analysis of common belief of rationality in strategic-form games
A Kripke-Lewis semantics for belief update and belief revision
Belief formation and belief updating under ambiguity: Evidence from experiments
Finding Common Ground when Experts Disagree: Belief Dominance over Portfolios of Alternatives
Associative Memory and Belief Formation
Belief polarization and Covid-19
On the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rules