Arbeitspapier

Majority voting leads to unanimity

We consider a situation where society decides, through majority voting in a secret ballot, between the alternatives of ‘reform’ and ‘status quo’. Reform is assumed to create a minority of winners, while being efficient in the Kaldor-Hicks sense. We explore the consequences of allowing binding transfers between voters conditional on the chosen alternative. In particular, we establish conditions under which the winners wish to compensate all losers, thus leading to unanimity for reform, rather than compensating some losers to form a non-maximal majority. The analysis employs concepts from cooperative game theory.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Memorandum ; No. 2005,02

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Cooperative Games
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Thema
voting
reform
status quo
Kaldor-Hicks sense
chosen alternative
unanimity for reform
cooperative game theory
Wahlsystem
Kooperatives Spiel
Kaldor-Hicks Kriterium

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Asheim, Geir B.
Claussen, Carl Andreas
Nilssen, Tore
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
University of Oslo, Department of Economics
(wo)
Oslo
(wann)
2005

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Asheim, Geir B.
  • Claussen, Carl Andreas
  • Nilssen, Tore
  • University of Oslo, Department of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2005

Ähnliche Objekte (12)