Refereeing the Game of Peer Review

Artikel

In this dialogue, the author depicts the journal peer review process as a high-stakes game involving three parties: editor, reviewer, and author. In light of a non-infrequent transposition of what should have been a constructive professional development process into a self-promotional social process, critiques of peer review have abounded, such as the "as-is" process recently recommended by Eric Tsang and Bruno Frey in this journal. While the "as-is" process highlights and potentially remedies some of the abuses of the system, there may be less radical options through professional education and development to preserve the critical developmental function of peer review.

Angaben zum Objekt

• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Journal: Academy of Management Learning & Education ; ISSN: 1944-9585 ; Volume: 7 ; Year: 2008 ; Issue: 1 ; Pages: 124-129 ; Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Wirtschaft ; Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing ; Personal, Professional, and Business Services ; Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility ; Personnel Economics: Training
• Thema: Peer review ; Professional autonomy ; Professional publication ; Academic freedom ; Peer control ; Professional development

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Raelin, Joseph A.
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Academy of Management ; ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
• (wo): Briarcliff Manor, NY
• (wann): 2008

Weitere Informationen

• DOI: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amle.2008.31413869
• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/268492
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 11.05.2025, 04:44 MESZ