Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:5 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2020
BMC medical research methodology ; 20, Heft 1 (13.5.2020), 1-7, 12.2020
- Creator
-
Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
Steingart, Karen R.
Tricco, Andrea C.
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
Kaunelis, David
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Baxter, Susan
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Emparanza, José Ignacio
Zamora, Javier
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-020-01004-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020072023082484222058
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
- Steingart, Karen R.
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
- Kaunelis, David
- Alonso-Coello, Pablo
- Baxter, Susan
- Bossuyt, Patrick M.
- Emparanza, José Ignacio
- Zamora, Javier
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family