Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency ; volume:14 ; number:1 ; day:21 ; month:7 ; year:2016 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2016
BMC medicine ; 14, Heft 1 (21.7.2016), 1-2, 12.2016
- Urheber
-
Welch, Vivian A.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Tricco, Andrea C.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016072321836
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
20.09.2025, 00:50 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Welch, Vivian A.
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Natural attack rate of influenza in unvaccinated children and adults: a meta-regression analysis
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Natural attack rate of influenza in unvaccinated children and adults: a meta-regression analysis
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Contacting authors to retrieve individual patient data: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Natural attack rate of influenza in unvaccinated children and adults: a meta-regression analysis
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers