- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
In: Vaccines (2022) 10:5, 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050689
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Würzburg
- (wer)
-
Universität Würzburg
- (wann)
-
2023
- Urheber
-
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner Karl
Frank, Tamara
Schmaderer, Christoph
Braunisch, Matthias C.
Renders, Lutz
Kranke, Peter
Popp, Maria
Seeber, Christian
Fichtner, Falk
Littig, Bianca
Carbajo-Lozoya, Javier
Meerpohl, Jörg J.
Haller, Bernhard
Allwang, Christine
- DOI
-
10.3390/vaccines10050689
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270561
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner Karl
- Frank, Tamara
- Schmaderer, Christoph
- Braunisch, Matthias C.
- Renders, Lutz
- Kranke, Peter
- Popp, Maria
- Seeber, Christian
- Fichtner, Falk
- Littig, Bianca
- Carbajo-Lozoya, Javier
- Meerpohl, Jörg J.
- Haller, Bernhard
- Allwang, Christine
- Universität Würzburg
Entstanden
- 2023
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
COVID-19 vaccines: fear of side effects among German health care workers
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
COVID-19 vaccines: fear of side effects among German health care workers
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin
COVID-19 vaccines: fear of side effects among German health care workers
Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence
Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study
Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? : : a systematic appraisal
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale
Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey
Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper
Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education