The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development

to connected objects

Abstract: Objective
Our objective was to develop an extension of the widely used GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and Tool for the integration of quality assurance and improvement (QAI) schemes with guideline development.

Study Design and Setting
We used a mixed-methods approach incorporating evidence from a systematic review, an expert workshop and a survey of experts to iteratively create an extension of the checklist for QAI through 3 rounds of feedback. As part of this process, we also refined criteria of a good guideline-based quality indicator.

Results
We developed a 40-item checklist extension addressing steps for the integration of QAI into guideline development across the existing 18 topics and created one new topic specific to QAI. The steps span from ‘organization, budget, planning and training’, to updating of QAI and guideline implementation.

Conclusions
The tool supports integration of QAI schemes with guideline development initiatives and it will be used in the forthcoming integrated European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer. Future work should evaluate this extension and QAI items requiring additional support for guideline developers and links to QAI schemes

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: Journal of clinical epidemiology. - 154 (2023) , 197-203, ISSN: 1878-5921

Event: Veröffentlichung

(where): Freiburg

(who): Universität

(when): 2022

Creator: Piggott, Thomas
Langendam, Miranda
Parmelli, Elena
Adolfsson, Jan
Akl, Elie A.
Armstrong, David
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Brożek, Jan L.
Follmann, Markus
Kopp, Ina
Meerpohl, Jörg J.
Neamţiu, Luciana
Nothacker, Monika Judith
Qaseem, Amir
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika
Wees, Philip J. van der
Schünemann, Holger J.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.002

URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-2266105

Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 25.03.2025, 1:56 PM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Piggott, Thomas
Langendam, Miranda
Parmelli, Elena
Adolfsson, Jan
Akl, Elie A.
Armstrong, David
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Brożek, Jan L.
Follmann, Markus
Kopp, Ina
Meerpohl, Jörg J.
Neamţiu, Luciana
Nothacker, Monika Judith
Qaseem, Amir
Giorgi Rossi, Paolo
Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika
Wees, Philip J. van der
Schünemann, Holger J.
Universität

Time of origin

2022

Other Objects (12)

Hochschulschrift

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Hochschulschrift

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Hochschulschrift

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

The GIN-McMaster guideline tool extension for the integration of quality improvement and quality assurance in guidelines: a description of the methods for its development

Object Details

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Time of origin

Other Objects (12)

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Wissenschaftliche Publikationspraxis in der klinischen Medizin : Wissenstransfer als Voraussetzung für evidenzbasierte Medizin

Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence

Systematic reviews should be at the heart of continuing medical education

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Methodological quality of guidelines for management of Lyme neuroborreliosis

Willingness to participate in, support or carry out scientific studies for benefit assessment of available medical interventions: a stakeholder survey

The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE)

Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: a repeated cross-sectional study

Initiation and continuation of randomized trials after the publication of a trial stopped early for benefit asking the same study question: STOPIT-3 study design

Related objects

Reset password