Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1748-5908

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:7 ; year:2009 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2009
Implementation science ; 4, Heft 1 (16.7.2009), 1-6, 12.2009

Creator: Michie, Susan

Contributor: Fixsen, Dean
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40

URN: urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070918271

Rights: Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:51 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Michie, Susan
Fixsen, Dean
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?

Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015

Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development

SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it

Related objects

Reset password