Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1748-5908
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:7 ; year:2009 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2009
Implementation science ; 4, Heft 1 (16.7.2009), 1-6, 12.2009
- Urheber
-
Michie, Susan
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Fixsen, Dean
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Eccles, Martin P.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1748-5908-4-40
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016070918271
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Michie, Susan
- Fixsen, Dean
- Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
- Eccles, Martin P.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development
SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it
Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour
Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Changing behaviour, ‘more or less’: do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?
Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2015
Developing clinical practice guidelines: reviewing, reporting, and publishing guidelines; updating guidelines; and the emerging issues of enhancing guideline implementability and accounting for comorbid conditions in guideline development