Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Evaluation of bias and precision in methods of analysis for pragmatic trials with missing outcome data: a simulation study ; volume:14 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; year:2013 ; pages:1 ; date:11.2013
Trials ; 14, Heft 1 (29.11.2013), 1, 11.2013
- Urheber
-
Joseph, Royes
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Sim, Julius
Ogollah, Reuben
Lewis, Martyn
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1745-6215-14-S1-P110
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016050234470
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Joseph, Royes
- Sim, Julius
- Ogollah, Reuben
- Lewis, Martyn
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
Bias and precision in early phase adaptive oncology studies and its consequences for confirmatory trials
Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision
Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry