- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials ; volume:5 ; number:1 ; day:02 ; month:3 ; year:2005 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2005
BMC medical research methodology ; 5, Heft 1 (02.3.2005), 1-8, 12.2005
- Creator
-
Hahn, Seokyung
- Contributor
-
Puffer, Suezann
Torgerson, David J.
Watson, Judith
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2288-5-10
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032126972
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
- 14.08.2025, 10:45 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Hahn, Seokyung
- Puffer, Suezann
- Torgerson, David J.
- Watson, Judith
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
A website for cluster randomised trials including stepped wedge: facilitating quality trials and methodological research
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials
Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations
Sample size in cluster randomised trials with unequal clusters
Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
Bayesian statistics in the design and analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials and their reporting quality: a methodological systematic review
Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
Methodological challenges designing pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trials in critical care
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review
A website for cluster randomised trials including stepped wedge: facilitating quality trials and methodological research
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials
Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations
Sample size in cluster randomised trials with unequal clusters
Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
Bayesian statistics in the design and analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials and their reporting quality: a methodological systematic review
Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
Methodological challenges designing pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trials in critical care
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review
A website for cluster randomised trials including stepped wedge: facilitating quality trials and methodological research
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials
Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations
Sample size in cluster randomised trials with unequal clusters
Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
Bayesian statistics in the design and analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials and their reporting quality: a methodological systematic review
Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
Methodological challenges designing pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trials in critical care
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials