Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study ; volume:21 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:3 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-12 ; date:12.2020
Trials ; 21, Heft 1 (23.3.2020), 1-12, 12.2020
- Creator
-
Bobb, Jennifer F.
Qiu, Hongxiang
Matthews, Abigail G.
McCormack, Jennifer
Bradley, Katharine A.
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-020-4148-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020061422073965583668
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:45 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Bobb, Jennifer F.
- Qiu, Hongxiang
- Matthews, Abigail G.
- McCormack, Jennifer
- Bradley, Katharine A.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
An agenda for addressing bias in conflict data
Addressing weight bias among pediatric healthcare clinical staff
Addressing bias in bagging and boosting regression models
Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
An agenda for addressing bias in conflict data
Addressing weight bias among pediatric healthcare clinical staff
Addressing bias in bagging and boosting regression models
Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
Using the half normal distribution to quantify covariate balance in cluster-randomized pragmatic trials
Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?
Negative spillover due to constraints on care delivery: a potential source of bias in pragmatic clinical trials
An agenda for addressing bias in conflict data
Addressing weight bias among pediatric healthcare clinical staff
Addressing bias in bagging and boosting regression models
Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Pragmatic trials and implementation science: grounds for divorce?
Irregular assessment times in pragmatic randomized clinical trials
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management