Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2397-7523
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation ; volume:3 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:4 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-5 ; date:12.2019
Diagnostic and prognostic research ; 3, Heft 1 (4.4.2019), 1-5, 12.2019
- Urheber
-
Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
Tricco, Andrea C.
Steingart, Karen R.
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
Kaunelis, David
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Baxter, Susan
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Zamora, Javier
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s41512-019-0052-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019112806102152167596
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Steingart, Karen R.
- Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
- Kaunelis, David
- Alonso-Coello, Pablo
- Baxter, Susan
- Bossuyt, Patrick M.
- Zamora, Javier
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family