Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:5 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2020
BMC medical research methodology ; 20, Heft 1 (13.5.2020), 1-7, 12.2020
- Urheber
-
Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
Steingart, Karen R.
Tricco, Andrea C.
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
Kaunelis, David
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Baxter, Susan
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Emparanza, José Ignacio
Zamora, Javier
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-020-01004-z
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020072023082484222058
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
- Steingart, Karen R.
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
- Kaunelis, David
- Alonso-Coello, Pablo
- Baxter, Susan
- Bossuyt, Patrick M.
- Emparanza, José Ignacio
- Zamora, Javier
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
Interventions for the prevention and management of occupational stress injury in first responders: a rapid overview of reviews
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family