Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences ; volume:10 ; number:1 ; day:9 ; month:1 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-18 ; date:12.2021
Systematic Reviews ; 10, Heft 1 (9.1.2021), 1-18, 12.2021
- Creator
-
Pillay, Jennifer
Riva, John J.
Tessier, Laure A.
Colquhoun, Heather
Lang, Eddy
Moore, Ainsley E.
Thombs, Brett D.
Wilson, Brenda J.
Tzenov, Amanda
Donnelly, Catherine
Émond, Marcel
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Milligan, Jamie
Keto-Lambert, Diana
Rahman, Sholeh
Vandermeer, Ben
Tricco, Andrea C.
Straus, Sharon E.
Thomas, Sonia M.
Mitchelmore, Bradley R.
Rolland-Harris, Elizabeth
Hartling, Lisa
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-020-01572-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021032121170724641899
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:33 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Pillay, Jennifer
- Riva, John J.
- Tessier, Laure A.
- Colquhoun, Heather
- Lang, Eddy
- Moore, Ainsley E.
- Thombs, Brett D.
- Wilson, Brenda J.
- Tzenov, Amanda
- Donnelly, Catherine
- Émond, Marcel
- Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
- Milligan, Jamie
- Keto-Lambert, Diana
- Rahman, Sholeh
- Vandermeer, Ben
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Straus, Sharon E.
- Thomas, Sonia M.
- Mitchelmore, Bradley R.
- Rolland-Harris, Elizabeth
- Hartling, Lisa
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data