Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Fall prevention interventions for older community-dwelling adults: systematic reviews on benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences ; volume:10 ; number:1 ; day:9 ; month:1 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-18 ; date:12.2021
Systematic Reviews ; 10, Heft 1 (9.1.2021), 1-18, 12.2021
- Urheber
-
Pillay, Jennifer
Riva, John J.
Tessier, Laure A.
Colquhoun, Heather
Lang, Eddy
Moore, Ainsley E.
Thombs, Brett D.
Wilson, Brenda J.
Tzenov, Amanda
Donnelly, Catherine
Émond, Marcel
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
Milligan, Jamie
Keto-Lambert, Diana
Rahman, Sholeh
Vandermeer, Ben
Tricco, Andrea C.
Straus, Sharon E.
Thomas, Sonia M.
Mitchelmore, Bradley R.
Rolland-Harris, Elizabeth
Hartling, Lisa
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-020-01572-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021032121170724641899
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
17.08.2025, 14:00 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Pillay, Jennifer
- Riva, John J.
- Tessier, Laure A.
- Colquhoun, Heather
- Lang, Eddy
- Moore, Ainsley E.
- Thombs, Brett D.
- Wilson, Brenda J.
- Tzenov, Amanda
- Donnelly, Catherine
- Émond, Marcel
- Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
- Milligan, Jamie
- Keto-Lambert, Diana
- Rahman, Sholeh
- Vandermeer, Ben
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Straus, Sharon E.
- Thomas, Sonia M.
- Mitchelmore, Bradley R.
- Rolland-Harris, Elizabeth
- Hartling, Lisa
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Correction: Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
The Cost and Public Health Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers