The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1752-1947
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:9 ; year:2013 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2013
Journal of medical case reports ; 7, Heft 1 (10.9.2013), 1-6, 12.2013
- Contributor
-
Gagnier, Joel J.
Kienle, Gunver
Altman, Douglas G.
Moher, David
Sox, Harold
Riley, David
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1752-1947-7-223
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016071030450
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
- 14.08.2025, 10:53 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Gagnier, Joel J.
- Kienle, Gunver
- Altman, Douglas G.
- Moher, David
- Sox, Harold
- Riley, David
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Erratum: the National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol