Assessing clinical reasoning: moving from in vitro to in vivo

Abstract: The last century saw dramatic changes in clinical practice and medical education and the concomitant rise in high-stakes, psychometrically-based examinations of medical knowledge. Higher scores on these high-stakes “in-vitro” examinations are modestly associated with better performance in clinical practice and provide a meaningful degree of assurance to the public about physicians’ competency in medical knowledge. However, results on such examinations explain only a small fraction of the wide variation currently seen in clinical practice and diagnostic errors remain a serious and vexing problem for patients and the healthcare system despite decades of high-stakes examinations. In this commentary we explore some of the limitations of high-stakes examinations in assessing clinical reasoning and propose utilizing situated cognition theory to guide research and development of innovative modes of ”in-vivo” assessments that can be used in longitudinally and continuously in clinical practice.

Standort
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Umfang
Online-Ressource
Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Assessing clinical reasoning: moving from in vitro to in vivo ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; year:2014 ; pages:111-117
Diagnosis ; 1, Heft 1 (2014), 111-117

Urheber
Holmboe, Eric S.
Durning, Steven J.

DOI
10.1515/dx-2013-0029
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2412011621593.048976671189
Rechteinformation
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Letzte Aktualisierung
15.08.2025, 07:21 MESZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Beteiligte

  • Holmboe, Eric S.
  • Durning, Steven J.

Ähnliche Objekte (12)