Arbeitspapier
Federalism and accountability with distorted election choices
Random factors such as bad weather or exogenous economic shocks affect the re-election of politicians and can reduce accountability. Such distorted election choices interact with the architecture of government. Contrasting centralized with decentralized political systems, this study shows that centralization is likely to result in higher accountability if election choices are subject to small random distortions. Furthermore, equity and efficiency arguments for uniform policies in centralized systems are derived as these are likely to result in the better overall performance of politicians and in more equal performance across regions.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 2789
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations: Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- Thema
-
accountability
federalism
decentralization
retrospective voting
Condorcet Jury Theorem
Föderalismus
Zentralstaat
Wiederwahl
Vergleich
Abstimmungsparadoxon
Theorie
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Kessing, Sebastian G.
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
- (wo)
-
Munich
- (wann)
-
2009
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Kessing, Sebastian G.
- Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
Entstanden
- 2009