Arbeitspapier

Federalism and accountability with distorted election choices

Random factors such as bad weather or exogenous economic shocks affect the re-election of politicians and can reduce accountability. Such distorted election choices interact with the architecture of government. Contrasting centralized with decentralized political systems, this study shows that centralization is likely to result in higher accountability if election choices are subject to small random distortions. Furthermore, equity and efficiency arguments for uniform policies in centralized systems are derived as these are likely to result in the better overall performance of politicians and in more equal performance across regions.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 2789

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations: Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Thema
accountability
federalism
decentralization
retrospective voting
Condorcet Jury Theorem
Föderalismus
Zentralstaat
Wiederwahl
Vergleich
Abstimmungsparadoxon
Theorie

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Kessing, Sebastian G.
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
(wo)
Munich
(wann)
2009

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Kessing, Sebastian G.
  • Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)

Entstanden

  • 2009

Ähnliche Objekte (12)