Comparison of bulk and sequential sampling methodologies on mammoth tooth enamel and their implications in paleoenvironmental reconstructions
Abstract δ 18 δ 18 δ 18 O values compared to the average sequential values, and some of the bulk values even fall outside the range of sequential values. The most likely explanation for the differences is the structure and formation stages of enamel that caused uneven distributions of different seasons recorded in the samples. This finding provides insights into current limitations of the two sampling methods and the applicability of cross-method data comparison from past studies.
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Comparison of bulk and sequential sampling methodologies on mammoth tooth enamel and their implications in paleoenvironmental reconstructions ; volume:71 ; number:2 ; year:2022 ; pages:227-241 ; extent:15
Quaternary science journal ; 71, Heft 2 (2022), 227-241 (gesamt 15)
- Creator
-
Liu, Zuorui
Prendergast, Amy
Drysdale, Russell
May, Jan-Hendrik
- DOI
-
10.5194/egqsj-71-227-2022
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022100605213889710627
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:32 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Liu, Zuorui
- Prendergast, Amy
- Drysdale, Russell
- May, Jan-Hendrik