Comparison of bulk and sequential sampling methodologies on mammoth tooth enamel and their implications in paleoenvironmental reconstructions

Abstract δ 18 δ 18 δ 18 O values compared to the average sequential values, and some of the bulk values even fall outside the range of sequential values. The most likely explanation for the differences is the structure and formation stages of enamel that caused uneven distributions of different seasons recorded in the samples. This finding provides insights into current limitations of the two sampling methods and the applicability of cross-method data comparison from past studies.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Comparison of bulk and sequential sampling methodologies on mammoth tooth enamel and their implications in paleoenvironmental reconstructions ; volume:71 ; number:2 ; year:2022 ; pages:227-241 ; extent:15
Quaternary science journal ; 71, Heft 2 (2022), 227-241 (gesamt 15)

Creator
Liu, Zuorui
Prendergast, Amy
Drysdale, Russell
May, Jan-Hendrik

DOI
10.5194/egqsj-71-227-2022
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022100605213889710627
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:32 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Liu, Zuorui
  • Prendergast, Amy
  • Drysdale, Russell
  • May, Jan-Hendrik

Other Objects (12)