Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes ; volume:8 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:8 ; year:2008 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2008
BMC medical research methodology ; 8, Heft 1 (13.8.2008), 1-9, 12.2008
- Urheber
-
Chittleborough, Catherine R.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Taylor, Anne W.
Baum, Fran E.
Hiller, Janet E.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2288-8-54
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032128754
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Chittleborough, Catherine R.
- Taylor, Anne W.
- Baum, Fran E.
- Hiller, Janet E.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Adaptive contact strategies in telephone and face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?