Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya
Research conducted over the past 30 years has demonstrated a reduction in errors and improvement in data quality when face–to-face social surveys are carried out using computers instead of paper and pencil. However, research examining the quality of data collected by interviewers using mobile devices is in its infancy and is based in developed countries. In a small pilot study conducted during the World Bank’s Kenya State of the Cities Baseline Survey, a face-to-face survey on living conditions, infrastructure and service delivery, the authors compared the quality of data collected using smartphones to data collected using tablets. The study of mobile touchscreen devices showed that tablets outperformed phones in some cases, but that the results were highly dependent on the interviewer.
- ISSN
-
2296-4754
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 12
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Survey Methods: Insights from the Field
- Thema
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Mobiltelefon
Kenia
CATI
Datenqualität
Interview
Umfrageforschung
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Hughes, Sarah M.
Haddaway, Samuel
Zhou, Hanzhi
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2016
- DOI
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Hughes, Sarah M.
- Haddaway, Samuel
- Zhou, Hanzhi
Entstanden
- 2016
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?