Arbeitspapier
How should evaluation be? Is a good evaluation of research also just? Towards the implementation of good evaluation
In this paper we answer the question of how evaluation should be by proposing a good evaluation of research practices. A good evaluation of research practices, intended as social practices à la MacIntyre, should take into account the stable motivations and the traits of the characters (i.e. the virtues) of researchers. We also show that a good evaluation is also just, beyond the sense of fairness, as working on good research practices implies keep into account a broader sense of justice. After that, we propose the development of a knowledge base for the assessment of "good" evaluations of research practices to implement a questionnaire for the assessment of researchers' virtues. Although the latter is a challenging task, the use of ontologies and taxonomic knowledge, and the reasoning algorithms that can make inferences on the basis of such knowledge represents a way for testing the consistency of the information reported in the questionnaire and to analyze in a correct and coherent way the data gathered through it.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: LEM Working Paper Series ; No. 2021/39
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Higher Education; Research Institutions
- Thema
-
research evaluation
research practices
virtue ethics
good evaluation
fair evaluation
just evaluation
ontology-based modelling
questionnaire
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Daraio, Cinzia
Vaccari, Alessio
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM)
- (wo)
-
Pisa
- (wann)
-
2021
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Daraio, Cinzia
- Vaccari, Alessio
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM)
Entstanden
- 2021
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
The welfare evaluation of primary goods: A suggestion
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents
Consumer evaluation of perceived risks for goods and services
Central Project Evaluation : Improving good financial governance in Ghana; Evaluation Report
Central Project Evaluation : Strengthening Good Financial Governance in Zambia; Evaluation Report
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Central Project Evaluation : Support to Good Resource Governance in Mali; Evaluation Report
Evaluation of the APEC environmental goods initiative: A dominant supplier approach
Good news and bad news in subjective performance evaluation
Good friends, just.
The welfare evaluation of primary goods: A suggestion
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents
Consumer evaluation of perceived risks for goods and services
Central Project Evaluation : Improving good financial governance in Ghana; Evaluation Report
Central Project Evaluation : Strengthening Good Financial Governance in Zambia; Evaluation Report
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Central Project Evaluation : Support to Good Resource Governance in Mali; Evaluation Report
Evaluation of the APEC environmental goods initiative: A dominant supplier approach
Good news and bad news in subjective performance evaluation
Good friends, just.
The welfare evaluation of primary goods: A suggestion
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents
Consumer evaluation of perceived risks for goods and services
Central Project Evaluation : Improving good financial governance in Ghana; Evaluation Report
Central Project Evaluation : Strengthening Good Financial Governance in Zambia; Evaluation Report
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Credence goods, costly diagnosis, and subjective evaluation
Central Project Evaluation : Support to Good Resource Governance in Mali; Evaluation Report
Evaluation of the APEC environmental goods initiative: A dominant supplier approach
Good news and bad news in subjective performance evaluation