Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Masterarbeit, 2020
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Berlin
- (wer)
-
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- (wann)
-
2022
- Urheber
-
Debuschewitz, Emil
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Schleyer, Christian
Sanders, Jürn
- DOI
-
10.18452/24438
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/25143-4
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:30 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Debuschewitz, Emil
- Schleyer, Christian
- Sanders, Jürn
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Entstanden
- 2022
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Environmental impacts of organic agriculture and the controversial scientific debates
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Nanosimilars: A Scientific or A Regulatory Debate?
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
Public perceptions of trustworthiness and authenticity towards scientists in controversial scientific fields
The pragmatic turn in the scientific realism debate
The Controversial Universe
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Deconstructing the Phantom: Duhem and the Scientific Realism Debate
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Environmental impacts of organic agriculture and the controversial scientific debates
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Nanosimilars: A Scientific or A Regulatory Debate?
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
Public perceptions of trustworthiness and authenticity towards scientists in controversial scientific fields
The pragmatic turn in the scientific realism debate
The Controversial Universe
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Deconstructing the Phantom: Duhem and the Scientific Realism Debate
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Environmental impacts of organic agriculture and the controversial scientific debates
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Nanosimilars: A Scientific or A Regulatory Debate?
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
Public perceptions of trustworthiness and authenticity towards scientists in controversial scientific fields
The pragmatic turn in the scientific realism debate
The Controversial Universe
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Deconstructing the Phantom: Duhem and the Scientific Realism Debate
Controversial nuclear ban treaty