Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2193-1127
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate ; volume:11 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:7 ; year:2022 ; pages:1 ; date:12.2022
EPJ Data Science ; 11, Heft 1 (4.7.2022), 1, 12.2022
- Urheber
-
Vilella, Salvatore
Semeraro, Alfonso
Paolotti, Daniela
Ruffo, Giancarlo
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00352-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022082323183890141143
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:39 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Vilella, Salvatore
- Semeraro, Alfonso
- Paolotti, Daniela
- Ruffo, Giancarlo
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit
Reconsidering Self-Love: Development of a Model and a Questionnaire For Measuring a Controversial Construct
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit
Reconsidering Self-Love: Development of a Model and a Questionnaire For Measuring a Controversial Construct
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit