The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2191-477X
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape ; day:13 ; month:3 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-26
Journal of management control ; (13.3.2021), 1-26
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s00187-021-00316-5
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021050221305795606735
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 14.08.2025, 11:03 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Veen-Dirks, Paula M. G. van
- Leliveld, Marijke C.
- Kaufmann, Wesley
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Fairness versus efficiency : how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Procedural fairness and equality of opportunity
Preserving Procedural Fairness in The AI Era
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning
Procedural satisfaction matters: Procedural fairness does not ; an experiment studying the effects of procedural judgments on outcome acceptance
Fairness that money can buy: Procedural egalitarianism in practice
Fairness That Money Can Buy. Procedural Egalitarianism in Practice
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Secret evidence in criminal proceedings : balancing procedural fairness and covert surveillance
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making : the role of public engagement
Examining procedural fairness in anti-doping disputes: a comparative empirical analysis
Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Fairness versus efficiency : how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Procedural fairness and equality of opportunity
Preserving Procedural Fairness in The AI Era
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning
Procedural satisfaction matters: Procedural fairness does not ; an experiment studying the effects of procedural judgments on outcome acceptance
Fairness that money can buy: Procedural egalitarianism in practice
Fairness That Money Can Buy. Procedural Egalitarianism in Practice
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Secret evidence in criminal proceedings : balancing procedural fairness and covert surveillance
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making : the role of public engagement
Examining procedural fairness in anti-doping disputes: a comparative empirical analysis
Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Fairness versus efficiency : how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination
Procedural fairness and equality of opportunity
Preserving Procedural Fairness in The AI Era
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning
Procedural satisfaction matters: Procedural fairness does not ; an experiment studying the effects of procedural judgments on outcome acceptance
Fairness that money can buy: Procedural egalitarianism in practice
Fairness That Money Can Buy. Procedural Egalitarianism in Practice
Does procedural fairness crowd out other-regarding concerns? A bidding experiment
Secret evidence in criminal proceedings : balancing procedural fairness and covert surveillance
Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making : the role of public engagement