Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Going online with a face-to-face household panel: effects of a mixed mode design on item and unit non-response
"There are considerable cost and timeliness advantages associated with web interviewing, compared to interviewer administration. However, web surveys do not perform well in terms of coverage and participation. To harness the strengths of both modes, existing probability-based interviewer-administered surveys are therefore being pushed to consider a mixed mode approach, including web. We assess the effect of introducing web interviewing as part of a mixed-mode design in the context of an existing longitudinal survey in which sample members have previously been interviewed face-to-face. Using experimental data from a household panel survey in the UK, we find that the mixed mode design resulted in a lower proportion of households fully responding. However, more than one in five households fully responded online. Overall, individual response rates were also lower with the mixed mode design, and we were unable to identify any subgroups where the reverse was true. Also, item nonresponse rates were higher with the mixed mode design." (author's abstract)
- Weitere Titel
-
Ein face-to-face Haushaltspanel online: Effekte eines gemischten Designs auf item- und unit-nonresponse
- ISSN
-
1864-3361
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 57-70
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Survey Research Methods, 9(1)
- Thema
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Umfrageforschung
Antwortverhalten
Online-Befragung
Interview
Panel
Längsschnittuntersuchung
Datengewinnung
Datenqualität
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Jäckle, Annette
Lynn, Peter
Burton, Jon
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2015
- DOI
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:26 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Jäckle, Annette
- Lynn, Peter
- Burton, Jon
Entstanden
- 2015
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Group mixing drives inequality in face-to-face gatherings
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys