Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2193-1127
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate ; volume:11 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:5 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-23 ; date:12.2022
EPJ Data Science ; 11, Heft 1 (16.5.2022), 1-23, 12.2022
- Creator
-
Vilella, Salvatore
Semeraro, Alfonso
Paolotti, Daniela
Ruffo, Giancarlo
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00342-w
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022082323190190292292
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:34 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Vilella, Salvatore
- Semeraro, Alfonso
- Paolotti, Daniela
- Ruffo, Giancarlo
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit
Reconsidering Self-Love: Development of a Model and a Questionnaire For Measuring a Controversial Construct
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit
Reconsidering Self-Love: Development of a Model and a Questionnaire For Measuring a Controversial Construct
Correction: Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate
Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
The Controversial Universe
Organic agriculture and the provision of public goods - Analyzing the controversial scientific debate on environmental impacts
Situationality in teaching controversial topics: (When) does controversial equal difficult?
Minimax credibility
Malalas and the Debate over Chalcedon: Tendencies, Influences, Sources
Controversial nuclear ban treaty
Standpoint Theories : Productively Controversial
Controversial poetry 1400-1625
Controversial information spreads faster and further than non-controversial information in Reddit