Arbeitspapier
Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs. Europe
This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in the European Union and the US to act as an automatic stabilizer in the current economic crisis. We find that automatic stabilizers absorb 38 per cent of a proportional income shock in the EU, compared to 32 per cent in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 48 per cent of the shock are absorbed in the EU, compared to 34 per cent in the US. This cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of 26 to 35 per cent in the EU and 19 per cent in the US. There is large heterogeneity within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. We also investigate whether countries with weak automatic stabilizers have enacted larger fiscal stimulus programs. We find no evidence supporting this view. However, we find that active fiscal policy is lower in more open economies.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 2878
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Business Fluctuations; Cycles
Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General
Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: Household
- Thema
-
automatic stabilization
crisis
liquidity constraints
fiscal stimulus
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Dolls, Mathias
Fuest, Clemens
Peichl, Andreas
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
- (wo)
-
Munich
- (wann)
-
2009
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Dolls, Mathias
- Fuest, Clemens
- Peichl, Andreas
- Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
Entstanden
- 2009