- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:7 ; month:10 ; year:2016 ; pages:1-10 ; date:12.2016
BMC medical research methodology ; 16, Heft 1 (7.10.2016), 1-10, 12.2016
- Urheber
-
Paludan-Müller, Asger
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Teindl Laursen, David Ruben
Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-016-0235-y
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611084961
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:55 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Paludan-Müller, Asger
- Teindl Laursen, David Ruben
- Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials
Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: strategies from two randomised trials
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Mitigating selection bias in organ allocation models
Treatment effect bias in randomised controlled trials using surrogate outcomes: a preliminary cohort study analysis
Assessing the presence of selection bias in meta-analyses of randomised trials using baseline heterogeneity
Gender bias in the allocation of student grants
The impact of allocation bias on test decisions in clinical trials with multiple endpoints using multiple testing strategies
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials
Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: strategies from two randomised trials
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Mitigating selection bias in organ allocation models
Treatment effect bias in randomised controlled trials using surrogate outcomes: a preliminary cohort study analysis
Assessing the presence of selection bias in meta-analyses of randomised trials using baseline heterogeneity
Gender bias in the allocation of student grants
The impact of allocation bias on test decisions in clinical trials with multiple endpoints using multiple testing strategies
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials
Reducing bias in open-label trials where blinded outcome assessment is not feasible: strategies from two randomised trials
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Mitigating selection bias in organ allocation models
Treatment effect bias in randomised controlled trials using surrogate outcomes: a preliminary cohort study analysis
Assessing the presence of selection bias in meta-analyses of randomised trials using baseline heterogeneity
Gender bias in the allocation of student grants