Controlling for false discoveries subsequently to large scale one‐way ANOVA testing in proteomics: Practical considerations

Abstract: In discovery proteomics, as well as many other “omic” approaches, the possibility to test for the differential abundance of hundreds (or of thousands) of features simultaneously is appealing, despite requiring specific statistical safeguards, among which controlling for the false discovery rate (FDR) has become standard. Moreover, when more than two biological conditions or group treatments are considered, it has become customary to rely on the one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) framework, where a first global differential abundance landscape provided by an omnibus test can be subsequently refined using various post‐hoc tests (PHTs). However, the interactions between the FDR control procedures and the PHTs are complex, because both correspond to different types of multiple test corrections (MTCs). This article surveys various ways to orchestrate them in a data processing workflow and discusses their pros and cons.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Controlling for false discoveries subsequently to large scale one‐way ANOVA testing in proteomics: Practical considerations ; day:25 ; month:06 ; year:2023 ; extent:12
Proteomics ; (25.06.2023) (gesamt 12)

Creator
Burger, Thomas

DOI
10.1002/pmic.202200406
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023062615093542511406
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
14.08.2025, 11:02 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Burger, Thomas

Other Objects (12)