Bericht
Settlement of investor-state disputes: Can states avoid arbitration?
Can states avoid lengthy and costly investor-state arbitration proceedings by entering into amicable settlements? While this is always possible in principle, data suggests that states struggle to do so. This Perspective discusses possible structural reforms for states to enable (and encourage) their officials to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations with investors.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Columbia FDI Perspectives ; No. 357
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Cannatà, Isabella
Loschi, Riccardo
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
- (where)
-
New York, NY
- (when)
-
2023
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Bericht
Associated
- Cannatà, Isabella
- Loschi, Riccardo
- Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Time of origin
- 2023
Other Objects (12)
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement : Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?
Investor-state dispute settlement: Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?
Advancing alternatives: Promoting mediation and conciliation in investor-state dispute settlement
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement : Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?
Investor-state dispute settlement: Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?
Advancing alternatives: Promoting mediation and conciliation in investor-state dispute settlement
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Using investor-state dispute settlement to enforce investor obligations
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Investor-state vs. state-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement: A government's dilemma
Investor-state dispute settlement – Pulling the chain tighter
Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Multinational Firm Behavior
Investor‐state dispute settlement and multinational firm behavior
Materializing corporate social responsibility in investor-state dispute settlement
Investor-state dispute settlement : Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?
Investor-state dispute settlement: Are arbitrators biased in favor of claimants?