Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1472-6963
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences ; volume:22 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:9 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2022
BMC health services research ; 22, Heft 1 (22.9.2022), 1-9, 12.2022
- Urheber
-
Bringedal, Berit H.
Rø, Karin Isaksson
Bååthe, Fredrik
Miljeteig, Ingrid
Magelssen, Morten
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12913-022-08582-2
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022120921050063030754
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:31 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Bringedal, Berit H.
- Rø, Karin Isaksson
- Bååthe, Fredrik
- Miljeteig, Ingrid
- Magelssen, Morten
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Priority setting at the clinical level: the case of nusinersen and the Norwegian national expert group
Correction to: Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Introduction: priority setting in global health
NOM removal technologies – Norwegian experiences
Research priority setting in UK podiatric surgery
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda
Evaluating health research priority-setting in low-income countries: a case study of health research priority-setting in Zambia
Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Priority setting at the clinical level: the case of nusinersen and the Norwegian national expert group
Correction to: Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Introduction: priority setting in global health
NOM removal technologies – Norwegian experiences
Research priority setting in UK podiatric surgery
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda
Evaluating health research priority-setting in low-income countries: a case study of health research priority-setting in Zambia
Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Priority setting at the clinical level: the case of nusinersen and the Norwegian national expert group
Correction to: Attitudes towards priority setting in the Norwegian health care system: a general population survey
Introduction: priority setting in global health
NOM removal technologies – Norwegian experiences
Research priority setting in UK podiatric surgery
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda