Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1478-7547
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting ; volume:17 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:9 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-13 ; date:12.2019
Cost effectiveness and resource allocation ; 17, Heft 1 (23.9.2019), 1-13, 12.2019
- Urheber
-
Rand, Leah
Dunn, Michael
Slade, Ingrid
Upadhyaya, Sheela
Sheehan, Mark
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12962-019-0188-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020020218322033792766
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:48 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Rand, Leah
- Dunn, Michael
- Slade, Ingrid
- Upadhyaya, Sheela
- Sheehan, Mark
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: the UK experience
Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Should Severity Assessments in Healthcare Priority Setting be Risk- and Time-Sensitive?
P381: Legionella priority control: development of a comprehensive tool for healthcare settings
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment
Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: the UK experience
Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Should Severity Assessments in Healthcare Priority Setting be Risk- and Time-Sensitive?
P381: Legionella priority control: development of a comprehensive tool for healthcare settings
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment
Guidelines and clinical priority setting during the COVID-19 pandemic – Norwegian doctors’ experiences
Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study
Innovation as a value in healthcare priority-setting: the UK experience
Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?
Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting
Should Severity Assessments in Healthcare Priority Setting be Risk- and Time-Sensitive?
P381: Legionella priority control: development of a comprehensive tool for healthcare settings
Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment