They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
Abstract: "This paper shows that the German labor market is more volatile than the US labor market at the business cycle frequency. Specifically, the volatility of the cyclical component of several labor market variables (e.g., the job-finding rate, the labor market tightness and vacancies) divided by the volatility of labor productivity is roughly twice as large as in the United States. We derive and simulate a simple model to explain this seemingly puzzling result. This new model provides explanations for this phenomenon, in particular the longer job tenure in Germany." (author's abstract)
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource, 27 S.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Veröffentlichungsversion
- Erschienen in
-
IAB Discussion Paper: Beiträge zum wissenschaftlichen Dialog aus dem Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung ; Bd. 12/2009
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Nürnberg
- (wann)
-
2009
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (IAB)
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-320449
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access unbekannt; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Gartner, Hermann
- Merkl, Christian
- Rothe, Thomas
- Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (IAB)
Entstanden
- 2009
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger!: More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
Are larger treasury issues more liquid? Evidence from bill reopenings
Antibody Tests: They are More Important than We Thought
Caution : Safeguards may appear more robust than they are
Should larger reserve holdings be more diversified?
Open access bibliographical databases : are they a threat, opportunity or even for real?
Why are racial differences in intelligence not larger?
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger!: More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
Are larger treasury issues more liquid? Evidence from bill reopenings
Antibody Tests: They are More Important than We Thought
Caution : Safeguards may appear more robust than they are
Should larger reserve holdings be more diversified?
Open access bibliographical databases : are they a threat, opportunity or even for real?
Why are racial differences in intelligence not larger?
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger!: More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
They are even larger! More (on) puzzling labor market volatilities
Are larger treasury issues more liquid? Evidence from bill reopenings
Antibody Tests: They are More Important than We Thought
Caution : Safeguards may appear more robust than they are
Should larger reserve holdings be more diversified?
Open access bibliographical databases : are they a threat, opportunity or even for real?