- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2196-0739
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
The standard setting process: validating interpretations of stakeholders ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:2 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-25 ; date:12.2019
Large-scale assessments in education ; 7, Heft 1 (18.2.2019), 1-25, 12.2019
- Klassifikation
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Urheber
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s40536-019-0071-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019031716110568116148
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Kampa, Nele
- Wagner, Helene
- Köller, Olaf
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings
Interpretations of probability
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings
Interpretations of probability
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings