- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2196-0739
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
The standard setting process: validating interpretations of stakeholders ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:2 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-25 ; date:12.2019
Large-scale assessments in education ; 7, Heft 1 (18.2.2019), 1-25, 12.2019
- Classification
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Creator
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s40536-019-0071-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019031716110568116148
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Kampa, Nele
- Wagner, Helene
- Köller, Olaf
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings
Interpretations of probability
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings
Interpretations of probability
Validating test score interpretations using time information
Exploring and validating construct interpretations of psychological measurements
Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations
Interpretations
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Virtual standard setting: setting cut scores
Stakeholders’ engagement with Ebola therapy research in resource limited settings
Actors' Interpretations
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting
Stakeholders
Validating the WHO maternal near miss tool: comparing high- and low-resource settings