- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource, 1 online resource.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:7 ; year:2023 ; pages:1-10 ; date:12.2023
Systematic Reviews ; 12, Heft 1 (14.7.2023), 1-10, 12.2023
- Urheber
-
Zhu, Linlin
Yang, Ziyu
Deng, Hongyu
Zhang, Yonggang
Liao, Xiaoyang
Clarke, Mike
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023101810470461824174
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:48 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Zhu, Linlin
- Yang, Ziyu
- Deng, Hongyu
- Zhang, Yonggang
- Liao, Xiaoyang
- Clarke, Mike
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomised trials
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review
The use of systematic reviews in the design of randomised trials
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
Can you believe what you read in the papers?
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Core outcome sets and trial registries
The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review
Survey of challenges and best practice strategies for participant recruitment to research projects in northern ireland
Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review