- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2458
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Australian health care providers’ views on opt-out HIV testing ; volume:15 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:9 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-9 ; date:12.2015
BMC public health ; 15, Heft 1 (14.9.2015), 1-9, 12.2015
- Creator
-
Leidel, Stacy
- Contributor
-
McConigley, Ruth
Boldy, Duncan
Wilson, Sally
Girdler, Sonya
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12889-015-2229-9
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016121524411
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:47 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Leidel, Stacy
- McConigley, Ruth
- Boldy, Duncan
- Wilson, Sally
- Girdler, Sonya
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
Stakeholder perceptions of using “opt-out” for tobacco use treatment in a cancer care setting: a qualitative evaluation of patients, providers, and desk staff
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
Stakeholder perceptions of using “opt-out” for tobacco use treatment in a cancer care setting: a qualitative evaluation of patients, providers, and desk staff
Opt-in vs. Opt-out = opt-in-opt-out? : On the activation of the ICC's jurisdiction over the crime of aggression
Opt in versus opt out: a free-entry analysis of privacy policies
The opt-out revolution: A descriptive analysis
The opt-out revolution: a descriptive analysis
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study
Opt Out of Online Sexism – Open Source Activism
Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of ‘opt in’ versus ‘opt out’ approaches
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-out
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing