Voluntary contributions 'vote out' public ones

Artikel

In a relatively recent paper, Gehrig and Stenbacka (Eur Econ Rev 51, 77-99, 2007) show that information sharing increases banks' profits to the detriment of creditworthy entrepreneurs in a model of a banking duopoly with switching costs and poaching. They restrict their analysis to the case in which adverse selection is not too strong.We analyze the complementary case and show that, when the economy suffers from strong adverse selection, information sharing still increases banks' profits, but it may or may not hurt talented entrepreneurs.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Journal: SERIEs - Journal of the Spanish Economic Association ; ISSN: 1869-4195 ; Volume: 2 ; Year: 2011 ; Issue: 3 ; Pages: 283-303 ; Heidelberg: Springer

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages ; Information and Product Quality; Standardization and Compatibility ; Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
• Subject: information sharing ; lending relationships ; poaching ; equilibrium switching ; Öffentliche Güter ; Allokation ; Externer Effekt ; Neue politische Ökonomie ; Theorie

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Calveras, Aleix ; Ganuza, Juan-José ; Llobet, Gerard
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Springer
• (where): Heidelberg
• (when): 2011

Further information

• DOI: doi:10.1007/s13209-011-0045-8
• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/77781
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET