Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Abstract: "A representative Swedish sample was asked to judge the relative trustworthiness of people from different groups, characterized by several dimensions such as political views and reading habits. A significant similarity effect was found in each of the seven dimensions analyzed. For example, rightwing voters consider Social Democratic voters to be much less trustworthy than rightwing voters, and vice versa. Thus, perceived trustworthiness appears to decrease generally with social distance, for which social identity theory offers a plausible explanation. Moreover, people who are old and live in small cities are generally considered more trustworthy than young people living in big cities. The results suggest reasons behind discrimination other than those underlying taste-based and statistical discrimination." [author's abstract]
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Postprint
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization ; 68 (2008) 3-4 ; 456-465
- DOI
-
10.1016/j.jebo.2008.08.004
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-277453
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access unbekannt; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 11:01 MESZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
Entstanden
- 2008
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who do we think we are: interdisciplinary dissonance and the development of professional identity
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Remembering : Who we are
AGCP: who are we?
Generation Y – Y We Are Not the Ones You Think We Are!
How we learn who we are
Who do you think you are? Boris Johnson
Volcanologists—who are we and where are we going?
We who are about to...
What we think.
Are we ready to think differently about setting PEEP?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who do we think we are: interdisciplinary dissonance and the development of professional identity
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Remembering : Who we are
AGCP: who are we?
Generation Y – Y We Are Not the Ones You Think We Are!
How we learn who we are
Who do you think you are? Boris Johnson
Volcanologists—who are we and where are we going?
We who are about to...
What we think.
Are we ready to think differently about setting PEEP?
Who are the trustworthy, we think?
Who do we think we are: interdisciplinary dissonance and the development of professional identity
Spoofing GPS is it really the time we think it is, and are we really where we think we are?
Remembering : Who we are
AGCP: who are we?
Generation Y – Y We Are Not the Ones You Think We Are!
How we learn who we are
Who do you think you are? Boris Johnson
Volcanologists—who are we and where are we going?
We who are about to...
What we think.