Arbeitspapier
Leadership and conditional cooperation in public good games: What difference does the game make?
We investigate experimentally whether the extent of conditional cooperation in public good games depends on the marginal return to the public good and type of game. The marginal return is varied from 0.2 to 0.4 to 0.8. The 'standard' game, in which three players contribute before a follower, is compared with a leader-follower game, in which one player leads and three follow. We find no strong evidence that the marginal return or type of game makes a difference to the extent of conditional cooperation. We also find no evidence that the type of game makes a difference to unconditional contributions. The level of marginal return does, however, have a strong effect on unconditional contributions. Our results highlight the critical role that can be played by leaders in a public good game.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: School of Economics Discussion Papers ; No. 1324
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Public Goods
- Thema
-
Public good
conditional cooperation
reciprocity
leadership
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Cartwright, Edward J.
Lovett, Denise
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
University of Kent, School of Economics
- (wo)
-
Canterbury
- (wann)
-
2013
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Cartwright, Edward J.
- Lovett, Denise
- University of Kent, School of Economics
Entstanden
- 2013