Arbeitspapier

When are mixed equilibria relevant?

Mixed Nash equilibria are a cornerstone of game theory, but their empirical relevance has always been controversial. We study in the laboratory two games whose unique NE is in completely mixed strategies; other treatments include the matching protocol (pairwise random vs population mean-matching), whether time is discrete or continuous, and whether players can specify mixtures or only pure strategies. Comparing point predictions, NE always does better than maximin and often does no worse than Logit QRE. NE predicts better than Center (50-50 mixes) under mean-matching, but otherwise not as well. By contrast, in a dominance solvable game, NE predicts better than alternatives in all treatments. Qualitative and quantitative dynamic models capture regularities across all treatments.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Working Paper ; No. 747

Classification
Wirtschaft
Noncooperative Games
Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Subject
Nash equilibrium
minimax
mixed strategy
directional learning
laboratory experiment

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Friedman, Daniel
Zhao, Shuchen
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
University of California, Economics Department
(where)
Santa Cruz, CA
(when)
2019

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Friedman, Daniel
  • Zhao, Shuchen
  • University of California, Economics Department

Time of origin

  • 2019

Other Objects (12)