Arbeitspapier
Minority Protection in Voting Mechanisms – Experimental Evidence
Under simple majority voting an absolute majority of voters may choose policies that are harmful to minorities. It is the purpose of sub- and super-majority rules to protect legitimate minority interests. We study how voting rules are chosen under the veil of ignorance and whether there are systematic biases in these choices. In our experiment, individuals choose voting rules for given distributions of gains and losses that can arise from a policy, but before learning their own valuation of the policy. We find that subjects on average adjust the voting rule in line with the skewness of the distribution. As a result, a higher share of the achievable surplus can be extracted with the suggested rules than with exogenously given simple majority voting. While the rule choices are not significantly biased towards under- or overprotection of the minority, towards majority voting or towards status-quo preserving rules, they only imperfectly reflect the distributions of benefits and costs. In expectation this leads to only 63% of the surplus being extracted. The participants are heterogeneous with respect to how well their rule choices adapt to the distribution of valuations, with a large share of the surplus loss caused by a small group of participants.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Discussion Paper ; No. 484
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
- Thema
-
minority protection
voting
experiments
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Engelmann, Dirk
Grüner, Hans Peter
Hoffmann, Timo
Possajenikov, Alex
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition
- (wo)
-
München und Berlin
- (wann)
-
2023
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Engelmann, Dirk
- Grüner, Hans Peter
- Hoffmann, Timo
- Possajenikov, Alex
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition
Entstanden
- 2023
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Minority protection in voting mechanisms: Experimental evidence
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority voting and public project provision
Minority voting and long-term decisions
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority Voting and Long-term Decisions
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Between minority protection and linguistic sovereignty
Practice of minority protection in Central Europe
Secessionism and minority protection in an uncertain world
A foundation for dominant strategy voting mechanisms
Minority protection in voting mechanisms: Experimental evidence
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority voting and public project provision
Minority voting and long-term decisions
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority Voting and Long-term Decisions
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Between minority protection and linguistic sovereignty
Practice of minority protection in Central Europe
Secessionism and minority protection in an uncertain world
A foundation for dominant strategy voting mechanisms
Minority protection in voting mechanisms: Experimental evidence
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority voting and public project provision
Minority voting and long-term decisions
Minority Voting and Public Project Provision
Minority Voting and Long-term Decisions
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Tailored Bayesian Mechanisms: Experimental Evidence from Two-Stage Voting Games
Between minority protection and linguistic sovereignty
Practice of minority protection in Central Europe
Secessionism and minority protection in an uncertain world